# A New Music of the Spheres

Kepler’s ** Mysterium Cosmographicum** Dream realised with the

**Asynsis Constructal**

**paradigm — a**

*Relativity of Complexity?**A new Three Body Problem paradigm.*

*A new Three Body Problem paradigm.*

To celebrate the completion of NASA’s survey of the solar system, we share a new Music of the Spheres, a complexity-led, Newtonian-Relativity compliant QED for the #AsynsisConstructal geometric-thermodynamics paradigm in both space and time:

- SPACE: The relative sizes of all astronomical bodies throughout the universe is a Constructal distribution due to gravitational tension:

*Researchers have explained why objects in the universe come in a wide variety of sizes, from the largest stars to the smallest asteroids -- and it has a lot to do with how paint cracks when it dries. When a volume is under internal tension -- as the early universe was due to gravity -- the most efficient way to relieve that tension is by 'cracking' hierarchically -- few large and many small.*

2. TIME: Is the Hum a Music of the Spheres for our age? If confirmed, this appears to be more Asynsis-Constructal QED — more evidence (this time from celestial mechanics), that the emergence of Asynsis energy-resource optimal, analogical temporal-spatial geometries often and best describes Constructal irreversibility-thermodynamic behaviours in nature at all scales and time frames.

What we’re beginning to understand is that the **Mysterium Cosmographicum **of Johannes Kepler, where the relative proportions of the ultimately ** Phi**-derived Platonic Solids mapped the

**of the planets, was more accurately true of**

*spatial distribution*

*the periodic, dynamical behaviour of the planets over time.*This behaviour is literally most sustainable because it allows the solar system (and so likely all extrasolar systems too, since this is a ** universal behaviour**), to act as an optimally stable ensemble most resistant to perturbations, that has a

*dynamic***that most easily persists in time as it orbits the**

**, thereby yielding a relatively stable environment for the**

*Milky Way*

*emergence***of planetary evolution, complexity, life itself and ultimately (when the homeostatic conditions are right, with life — in turn yielding artificial life),**

*SynPlexity*

*.**And what keeps us in the Goldilocks zone, and saves Earth from being hurled into the celestial void, to freeze into a barren snowball?*

Remarkably, it’s Asynsis dynamical, spatio-temporal geometry, as hypothesised here by the author in ** AD magazine, published in 1994**.

Recent substantiation, via Galileo unbound:

So the emergence of both the spatial scale and structure, coupled with the temporal stability of celestial bodies’ relative movements, appears to follow the **AsynsisConstructal** paradigm, which ultimately in turn, is related to the *E8 Lie Group Cosmology of Garrett Lisi**.*

So do we have a **KAM theory natural constant** for *emergence*** **itself?

We would argue that the answer (in this pure “

**” case of orbital harmonics), would have to be a resounding, profoundly existential “**

*Pythagorean***”.**

*yes**“The logical conclusion is that feedback is present via perturbations…(that reveals **energy** **minimisation** and **optimal sufficient energy exchange** via the **Principle of Least Action** **— first published in **AD** Magazine in 1994, and yields maximum (adaptive yet resilient), stability for the sun & planets as a complex dynamical system and **spatio-temporal architecture**, via a **self-organised critical**, **poised-realm** of **universality**).”*

*Nigel Reading RIBA*And for how this originally Galilean-Newtonian classical physics paradigm yielded to the higher dimensions of Chaos & Complexity theory via Poincaré, further inspiring brilliant SciFi…we need to explore the Three Body Problem.